1994-06-01 - Re: Clipper in patent trouble?

Header Data

From: sommerfeld@localhost.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)
To: smb@research.att.com
Message Hash: d075b3f6bce6e1389b7e7ddd1cbba286ffdffb652a954abbdbc4adabce3632b1
Message ID: <199406011610.MAA00382@localhost>
Reply To: <9406011454.AA27332@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-01 16:30:18 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 1 Jun 94 09:30:18 PDT

Raw message

From: sommerfeld@localhost.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 94 09:30:18 PDT
To: smb@research.att.com
Subject: Re: Clipper in patent trouble?
In-Reply-To: <9406011454.AA27332@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199406011610.MAA00382@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	... Micali's major stuff, the ``fair'' public-key based systems.

Just to throw another sound bite in the pot:

Why would anyone in their right mind use a cryptosystem that's only "fair"
when they have their choice of so many "good" and "excellent" ones like
IDEA and RSA as well? :-) :-)

disclaimer: I haven't read Micali's papers in detail, but I understand that
the "fair' cryptosystem is effectively "key escrow in software".  Actually,
I haven't seen his protocols discussed in any level of detail on this list.
An overview might help improve the S/N ratio here..

   build 'em first, patent 'em, and *don't* license them to the government... 

Alternatively, hold out for 10% of the capital cost of the *entire*
communications system and put the money to good use if they're stupid
enough to pay.

					- Bill





Thread