From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 94 15:44:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: A black eye for whom?
Message-ID: <9406032346.AA20791@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 
 
On Fri,  3 Jun 1994 21:48:53 UTC
 an5877@anon.penet.fi (deadbeat) wrote -
 
> I won't ask why the big deal is being made about all of this -- the
> agenda surrounding Clipper and friends is clearly a political one, not
> a technical one, so it is no surprise to hear even the technical voices,
> i.e., this list, trumpeting Blaze's paper as though it were a dagger in
> the heart of SKIPJACK.  But let's all acknowledge the technical weight
> and importance of Blaze's result for what it is: minuscule.
 
 
Bullshit.
 
_Any_ pitfall in key escrow system or the Clipper technology itself
is far from "miniscule."
 
_______________________________________________________________________________
Paul Ferguson                         
US Sprint 
Enterprise Internet Engineering                    tel: 703.904.2437 
Herndon, Virginia  USA                        internet: paul@hawk.sprintmrn.com
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
 
iQCVAgUBLe+x15RLcZSdHMBNAQFgCAQAs6HdAdxs6wVnv2ScKd5cR9jVdz+rVyNn
gceOqi/BaOq8utu2lIPvO74qvMufCTycVBrSBPzFIZzfdzGKcwhmKIikpHMCy3f3
II1iM++P6+3HLzVGJUrTca7qMVS8H6fyPda7IufmYDOjqy8KEFfwwkoCXrnTBNY0
VHPYg2HYd3Y=
=yI2v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6
 
mQCNAiuk0/8AAAEEALqlLc+x9lmgiJCRSpu/aPhQdi0hMjwiGlN2B/GJQqgZPhTb
pR+u5/blGogqT+WwcXZ2XfEdIV19FrJY4BXGGn4+4TjdVN3XuuCHuueoygBAmOQD
IloU6SJuDqJa0kFA5X/i/1ELn86I5+8A4Hx88FiYJIVUBR6SApRLcZSdHMBNAAUR
tCdQYXVsIEZlcmd1c29uIDxwYXVsQGhhd2suc3ByaW50bXJuLmNvbT60JVBhdWwg
RmVyZ3Vzb24gPGZlcmd1c29uQGljbTEuaWNwLm5ldD4=
=rtcO
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----