1994-06-03 - IMP (was Re: ecash-info (fwd))

Header Data

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d87ff3e47cabaaaa915826ca23e832b088e164e11766cc37305c18d21b9ae82c
Message ID: <9406032131.AA09024@ah.com>
Reply To: <9406021641.AA02889@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-03 21:22:36 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Jun 94 14:22:36 PDT

Raw message

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 94 14:22:36 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: IMP (was Re: ecash-info (fwd))
In-Reply-To: <9406021641.AA02889@marvin.jta.edd.ca.gov>
Message-ID: <9406032131.AA09024@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   > Transmitting card numbers electronically over the Internet can only
   > exacerbate that problem.

   Yes, if transmitted in the clear, PGP is legal now :-).  Vendors on the
   net need to be pushed to use encryption.

I'm not referring to the problem of sniffing credit card numbers off
the net.  I'm referring to the problem of credit card fraud by the
operation on the receiving end.  Even if the transmission is
encrypted, there's still risk.

Eric





Thread