1994-06-23 - Re: Another Cellular Vict

Header Data

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
To: sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us
Message Hash: dd11a10f9f0e2252d0c2057e85bdc5dde12b85e38a0b3f8fe7bbcb0bac77ba51
Message ID: <199406232119.OAA16482@servo.qualcomm.com>
Reply To: <199406221242.IAA00419@orchard.medford.ma.us>
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-23 21:20:06 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 Jun 94 14:20:06 PDT

Raw message

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 94 14:20:06 PDT
To: sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us
Subject: Re: Another Cellular Vict
In-Reply-To: <199406221242.IAA00419@orchard.medford.ma.us>
Message-ID: <199406232119.OAA16482@servo.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Well, I'm not sure how well that would work...  The "dither" on the
>RTT can't go negative (for obvious reasons :-) ).

Sure it can. We're not talking RTT in the Internet sense.  In a spread
spectrum system, deterministic pseudo-random sequences are used for
the spreading codes; the receiver always knows the future of the sequence.

We generate ours with conventional linear feedback shift
registers. The mobile phone tracks the code phase of the cell site and
slaves its own coded transmissions to that. All you'd have to do is to
add a random time-varying phase to the tracking loop. That would cause
the measured delay to be either greater than or less than the real
value.

There would be limits to how far you could vary the delay, but the
tolerance at the cell has to be on the order of the cell radius for
the system to work anyway.

Phil






Thread