1994-06-04 - Re: more info from talk at MIT yesterday.

Header Data

From: “gtoal@gtoal.com” <gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f31370dd05388367e66a6656ed4e1da03c546918015487b5fbb64e371377d377
Message ID: <9406041651.AA04566@pizzabox.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-06-04 17:28:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Jun 94 10:28:59 PDT

Raw message

From: "gtoal@gtoal.com" <gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 94 10:28:59 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: more info from talk at MIT yesterday.
Message-ID: <9406041651.AA04566@pizzabox.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	> Defense Messaging System is supposedly going to use Skipjack,
	> so I assume it's reasonably secure - and if there *are*
	> NSA-only backdoors in the algorithm, at least they won't
	> be admitting it to your neighbor hood cops and FBI wiretappers,
	> so you'd have to be an *interesting* suspect to get cracked.

	Indeed -- let us recall that Coventry was bombed into ruins rather
	than reveal that the Brits could read German codes in WWII.

I don't recall that at all, and neither do the papers that were recently
released under the 30 year rule.  (Somewhat delayed...)

G





Thread