From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0c33fbaa806b06d512044f50e32e87f1bb0198d23e3821a1badcc928c6625fc7
Message ID: <9407261944.AA04628@smds.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-26 19:57:49 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 26 Jul 94 12:57:49 PDT
From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 94 12:57:49 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNKS TO THE RESCUE
Message-ID: <9407261944.AA04628@smds.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I think Norm gets the prize for the best garage door opener:
> ...How about the car unit signing successive numbers....
But this raises an idle question: how much easier is it to break
a DES key given a sequence of (n, DES(n)) where the n's are
successive numbers, than it is if the n's are random (but still
known)? I doubt this is a practical threat for garage doors.
- -Steve
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
nutritional information per serving:
less than one (1) bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
aKxB8nktcBAeQHabQP/d7yhWgpGZBIoIqII8cY9nG55HYHgvt3niQCVAgUBLMs3K
ui6XaCZmKH68fOWYYySKAzPkXyfYKnOlzsIjp2tPEot1Q5A3/n54PBKrUDN9tHVz
3Ch466q9EKUuDulTU6OLsilzmRvQJn0EJhzd4pht6hSnC1R3seYNhUYhoJViCcCG
sRjLQs4iVVM=
=9wqs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1994
Return to “Linn Stanton <lstanton@sten.lehman.com>”