From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
To: doug@OpenMind.com (Doug Cutrell)
Message Hash: 0dc7d4a896765167eb855096d8fcd7ee6c7ab693d75157da6eba55a210aa281e
Message ID: <199407091548.KAA04389@zoom.bga.com>
Reply To: <13DD5626070@BlueSky.OpenMind.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-09 15:48:32 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Jul 94 08:48:32 PDT
From: Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 94 08:48:32 PDT
To: doug@OpenMind.com (Doug Cutrell)
Subject: Re: All the free energy in the universe
In-Reply-To: <13DD5626070@BlueSky.OpenMind.com>
Message-ID: <199407091548.KAA04389@zoom.bga.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
>
> The above analysis may be incorrect... there may be no limit to the amount
> of computation that can be done with a given finite amount of energy.
>
> The late Nobel laureate Richard Feynman became very interested in the
> subject of computation and physics towards the end of his life. My
> understanding is that he concluded that there was no apparent limitation to
> the amount of computation that could be completed with a given amount of
> free energy. Computation may indeed always dissipate energy, but Feyman's
> conclusion was that this dissipated energy can be made arbitrarily small --
> that there is no fundamental quantum limitation on the amount of
> computation that can be performed at any given mass-energy scale. The kT
> per logical operation can always be reduced to finer and finer scales.
> Presumably, this would require advances to ever new technologies, based on
> new physical forces that are relevant at finer scales (down to computation
> based on the interactions of quarks as in QCD, gravitons, etc.) Of course,
> since I can't give you references, you have to take this with a brick of
> salt... can anyone else comment on whether they have heard this about
> Feynman's conclusions?
>
Hi Doug,
If you will check in the cumulative index for SciAm you will find several
articles on this topic (which include references to headier stuff).
Take care.
Return to July 1994
Return to “Jim choate <ravage@bga.com>”