From: Richard Johnson <Richard.Johnson@Colorado.EDU>
To: rittle@comm.mot.com
Message Hash: 0e79a1f2d83c97cec0cfdcb16d6804fa520e399375292d64eecf7557be53b8b3
Message ID: <199407242114.PAA04742@spot.Colorado.EDU>
Reply To: <9407220224.AA12751@supra.comm.mot.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-26 03:10:50 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Jul 94 20:10:50 PDT
From: Richard Johnson <Richard.Johnson@Colorado.EDU>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 94 20:10:50 PDT
To: rittle@comm.mot.com
Subject: Re: The Clipper Chip Proposal
In-Reply-To: <9407220224.AA12751@supra.comm.mot.com>
Message-ID: <199407242114.PAA04742@spot.Colorado.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From the keyboard of: rittle@comm.mot.com (Loren James Rittle) in an
open letter to our Gorewellian vice president:
I also support completely voluntary (i.e. no outside government coercion)
encryption key escrow for all private individuals and private-sector
companies, if they themselves so chose it.
There is, however, no reasonable reason what-so-ever for government to be
involved in this escrow. Just as with escrow of funds during property
transactions, those involved will choose their own non-governmental
escrow agents.
A simple analogy may serve to illustrate this crucial concept for Gore:
If I wish to leave a spare house key with my neighbor while I'm on
vacation, there's no reason I have to also leave a spare key with the
cops.
Rich
--
Loudyellnet: Richard Johnson | Sneakernet: ECNT1-6, CB 429, CU Boulder
Phonenet: +1.303.492.0590 | Internet: Richard.Johnson@Colorado.EDU
RIPEM and PGP public keys available by server, finger or request
Speaker to avalanche dragons. Do you really think they listen?
Return to July 1994
Return to “rittle@comm.mot.com (Loren James Rittle)”