1994-07-04 - Re: War of the 2.x versions!

Header Data

From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 10d4caf3bfbf25cfa6db4d04aea1a5483241c9dfcd31a025870ec5d0d72dd231
Message ID: <940704123455N6djgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-04 17:18:27 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Jul 94 10:18:27 PDT

Raw message

From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 94 10:18:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: War of the 2.x versions!
Message-ID: <940704123455N6djgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Joseph Block <jpb@gate.net> writes:

> So what stops someone from patching 2.3?  Since 2.3 is already allegedly in
> violation, why not just make it compatible with 2.6?
     Because if you did that, you wouldn't need 2.6ui. Of course, 2.6ui
uses no MIT code and doesn't use 2.3a code either. It's from scratch.
Yeah, that's the ticket.


                                                  --Jeff
--
======  ======    +----------------jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us----------------+
  ==    ==        | The new, improved, environmentally safe, bigger, better,|
  ==    ==  -=    | faster, hypo-allergenic, AND politically correct .sig.  |
====    ======    | Now with a new fresh lemon scent!                       |
PGP Key Available +---------------------------------------------------------+ 





Thread