From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 10d4caf3bfbf25cfa6db4d04aea1a5483241c9dfcd31a025870ec5d0d72dd231
Message ID: <940704123455N6djgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-04 17:18:27 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Jul 94 10:18:27 PDT
From: Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 94 10:18:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: War of the 2.x versions!
Message-ID: <940704123455N6djgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Joseph Block <jpb@gate.net> writes:
> So what stops someone from patching 2.3? Since 2.3 is already allegedly in
> violation, why not just make it compatible with 2.6?
Because if you did that, you wouldn't need 2.6ui. Of course, 2.6ui
uses no MIT code and doesn't use 2.3a code either. It's from scratch.
Yeah, that's the ticket.
--Jeff
--
====== ====== +----------------jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us----------------+
== == | The new, improved, environmentally safe, bigger, better,|
== == -= | faster, hypo-allergenic, AND politically correct .sig. |
==== ====== | Now with a new fresh lemon scent! |
PGP Key Available +---------------------------------------------------------+
Return to July 1994
Return to “Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>”
1994-07-04 (Mon, 4 Jul 94 10:18:27 PDT) - Re: War of the 2.x versions! - Jeff Gostin <jgostin@eternal.pha.pa.us>