From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 19c65b07b219cc837cd1b4baf54c28400e6af988f0446b96722e2eed0a4f5a04
Message ID: <199407221703.SAA26235@an-teallach.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-22 17:03:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 10:03:02 PDT
From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 10:03:02 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Gore's "new and improved" key escrow proposal
Message-ID: <199407221703.SAA26235@an-teallach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
: From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@muddcs.cs.hmc.edu>
: Tim May said:
: > Others here will have a clearer idea than I have, but I don't think a
: > "software standard" is what is now being planned. Software-only
: > solution cannot possibly have the security that's needed [...]
: My reading of the BSA blurb was that software key escrow really is
: being planned: "software implementable [and] based on a non-classified
: encryption formula". Yes, this sounds pretty silly. I don't see how
: you could possibly prevent a rogue phone from interoperating with a
: fascistic one.
... except by legislation. Make no bones about it, this is the start of
the final attack to outlaw non-escrowed encryption.
G
Return to July 1994
Return to “gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)”
1994-07-22 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 10:03:02 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)