From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
To: Jim Hart <hart@chaos.bsu.edu>
Message Hash: 1a9c247f6e5b029ed958a0de96398a2a217bff8b816bdee5f5c3c8411a6652fa
Message ID: <199407281302.AA03998@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-28 13:03:13 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 06:03:13 PDT
From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 06:03:13 PDT
To: Jim Hart <hart@chaos.bsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Voice/Fax Checks
Message-ID: <199407281302.AA03998@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 04:43 AM 7/25/94 -0500, Jim Hart wrote:
>Isn't this kind of like writing them a blank check? If I tell
>them to make the check out for $20 and they make it out for
>$100, how do I repudiate that? Not only that, how do I prevent
>them from writing and cashing more checks by increasing the
>sequence number?
Nothing. Just like I can obtain your check info (by getting you to write me
a check) and forging a physical check using DTP technology (Forbes cover
story of several years ago). You can disavow the check though and demand a
credit from your bank.
If you don't complain, the transfer stands. If you do, you get your money
back.
I don't think they ever passed the Uniform Commercial Code proposal that
would have made checks just like electronic payments where you are liable
for $50 if you don't make a timely report of the problem. Traditionally,
you *never* had to challange a check and you could get all of your money
back if the bank paid a check on a "forged drawer's signature."
DCF
Return to July 1994
Return to “frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)”
1994-07-28 (Thu, 28 Jul 94 06:03:13 PDT) - Re: Voice/Fax Checks - frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)