From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 2619d8bf0031e9bda7313d5b4af79203139eff32bc38f0d106ad4584f5ba9547
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9407161600.A10052-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-16 23:50:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Jul 94 16:50:58 PDT
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 94 16:50:58 PDT
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: TEMPEST
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9407161600.A10052-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
C'punks,
I seem to recall a thread on the origin of the term "tempest" with regard
to electromagnetic emissions. Several people thought it was an acronym
and various phrases were offered.
I found a story I don't think was mentioned. It's in an article from
/Full Disclosure/, #26. The article, "Hi-Tech Fraud," is by James E.
Carter of Bank Security. The relevant part says:
... Is there a real danger because of EME?
Well, I have known about EME for over thirty years and back
then our government was so concerned the subject was classified.
Our government gave EME the name "Tempest." When this issue
was brought up before a congressional committee, the statement
was made, "it sounds like a tempest in a teapot." So thereafter
the name Tempest was adopted, so the story goes.
Sounds plausible.
S a n d y
Return to July 1994
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”
1994-07-16 (Sat, 16 Jul 94 16:50:58 PDT) - TEMPEST - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>