From: nobody@ds1.wu-wien.ac.at
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2800d60cf35988b015695de8f598693cc968a3f22097fb16f554683dd4e2a37f
Message ID: <9407040349.AA14158@ds1.wu-wien.ac.at>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-04 03:49:41 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Jul 94 20:49:41 PDT
From: nobody@ds1.wu-wien.ac.at
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 94 20:49:41 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: PGP Questions
Message-ID: <9407040349.AA14158@ds1.wu-wien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I seem to remember reading somewhere that using PGP to encrypt a message
for multiple recipients (in the same output file) somehow made
cryptanalysis easier, but I don't seem to recall the rationale behind that
concern. Can somebody comment on that.
Also, concerning the PGP 2.3a/2.6/2.6ui controversy, is the only "problem"
with 2.6 the fact that after 9/1/94 it will start reporting an incompatible
version number that will make its output unreadable by older versions? If
so, and if source code is available, why couldn't the date checking routine
be located in the source code and simply commented out, then the whole
thing recompiled?
--
Return to July 1994
Return to “nobody@ds1.wu-wien.ac.at”
1994-07-04 (Sun, 3 Jul 94 20:49:41 PDT) - PGP Questions - nobody@ds1.wu-wien.ac.at