From: Ian Farquhar <ifarqhar@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au>
To: harmon@tenet.edu (Dan Harmon)
Message Hash: 282a5873027656ed5406273308e93dac3b4fe672305f8bdacba114ee30b0201e
Message ID: <199407122219.AA28875@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9407121441.B1198-0100000@Joyce-Perkins.tenet.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-12 22:19:45 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Jul 94 15:19:45 PDT
From: Ian Farquhar <ifarqhar@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 94 15:19:45 PDT
To: harmon@tenet.edu (Dan Harmon)
Subject: Re: NSA technology transfer (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9407121441.B1198-0100000@Joyce-Perkins.tenet.edu>
Message-ID: <199407122219.AA28875@laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>It is obvious that they really don't want to transfer the technology. And if
>they do it will be to someone with deep pockets and who they like.
Which rather gives one the impression that the technology transfer program
was forced from above, rather than being their own initiative.
Two suggestions:
1. See your local Congress-critter, and explain that the NSA's Technology
Transfer program is being subverted. After all, you guys in the US PAID
for the development of this algorithm, and it strikes me as being a bit
offensive that you should pay again to see it.
2. FOI it.
I'm rather glad that _I_ didn't ring the number up and ask for the details
("Hello, I am a foreign national. Can I have this algorithm please?")
I must admit that I was sorely tempted after reading Bruce's post, though!
Ian.
Return to July 1994
Return to “mgream@acacia.itd.uts.edu.au (Matthew Gream)”