From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2a31a7ff794fb2add306c5843f5c84c73943d6bf9a4747ed3be89bb56a712d74
Message ID: <m0qMiAL-0005GwC@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-09 19:38:35 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Jul 94 12:38:35 PDT
From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 94 12:38:35 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Forwarding or pointers + attorney use of PGP
Message-ID: <m0qMiAL-0005GwC@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Count this as a vote in favor of pointers to information instead of
reposts, at least where the original is easily accessed by most folks.
The only time I find reproductions in toto useful is where the information
comes from private mail, obscure mailing lists, or other sources I can't
get.
Also, I thought some C-punks might be pleased to hear that PGP and
discussions of encryption/confidentiality are making their way into
the legal community - a law/computers list I'm on has recently had a
spurt of messages re confidentiality and attorney/client privilege,
and every response so far has mentioned PGP in a positive light.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.5
iQCVAgUBLh77nX3YhjZY3fMNAQHlFAP7Bv9WvNrzmwj83YeznlObs7tsEDViVAtH
oa2J+mVcLsSbXQGc8/lIsSKHsQarPdXn3nalo3fuG8lcRNPWKXDKlwnoagkCo5D8
DQrWfOr6toM4bYUNr7PfL9Q+Ou4faCX/5Yl7cTWlzM1cGmiETGpjkd4tSUNJ8DkD
KfN0n0X+wgk=
=W461
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1994
Return to “greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)”
1994-07-09 (Sat, 9 Jul 94 12:38:35 PDT) - Forwarding or pointers + attorney use of PGP - greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)