From: pjm@gasco.com (Patrick J. May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 32d5129a0ad485a9abe47b12c86a49f818c2242bbd0e589fe9e2fe3ad31f4025
Message ID: <m0qTwJb-0004uqC@athena.gasco.com>
Reply To: <9407290326.AA16170@owl.ma.utexas.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-29 18:06:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Jul 94 11:06:27 PDT
From: pjm@gasco.com (Patrick J. May)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 94 11:06:27 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Just say NYET to kneejerking
In-Reply-To: <9407290326.AA16170@owl.ma.utexas.edu>
Message-ID: <m0qTwJb-0004uqC@athena.gasco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
nzook@math.utexas.edu writes:
> I must admit that I'm disappointed. I figured that I would take some hits,
> but for people to only scan a post before reaching for the lighter...
I must admit that I'm disappointed. I figured people on this
list would assume good faith on the part of other list members until
it was demonstrated otherwise.
I read your entire post. You advocate using the government to
force people to behave as you see fit. I pointed out that the
services you want could be offered without the need for more
legislation.
> 2- The censorship that I advance is censorship _by parents_ _for their own
> children_. Only.
>
> People have talked about cable boxxes and telephones. Are you not aware
> that many cable companies offer boxes with a (physical) key that must be
> present in order for certain channels to come through? That the phone
> companies currently allow customers to disallow outgoing 900 calls? My
> idea is to implement a net-equivalent system--household by household
> determination of what will be allowed into their homes.
The cable and telephone companies _offer_ these services. You
propose mandating what is provided.
> 3- In this system, the work to determine which parts of the net to allow/
> disallow access to falls entirely on the parents.
And on the Department of Internet Connectivity and Hiding Erotic
Data (DICHED).
> 4- I believe that this system could be used to gain the protection sysops
> deserve.
What's wrong with leaving the sysops free to protect themselves
as they see fit?
Regards,
Patrick May
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A contract programmer is always intense."
pjm@gasco.com
Return to July 1994
Return to “pjm@gasco.com (Patrick J. May)”