1994-07-28 - RE:

Header Data

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: merriman@metronet.com
Message Hash: 37eea025772273ae001c4a64e339bc963d6d34805ed03333b87cc7670b31893c
Message ID: <9407280306.AA18192@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-28 03:06:49 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 20:06:49 PDT

Raw message

From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 20:06:49 PDT
To: merriman@metronet.com
Subject: RE:
Message-ID: <9407280306.AA18192@netmail2.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From: David K. Merriman

It has been brought up on the Cypherpunks mailing list that Microsoft is
proposing to include public-key escrow as a *built-in* "function" of future
products - Chicago and Daytona have been specifically mentioned.
...................................................................... 
..........

No, this is not correct.  It was speculation from Tim May on possible 
developments, based on his interpretation of recent events and on email 
which I sent to him.  This email was referring to the fact that his 
concerns notwithstanding,  it is not an easy thing to implement a 
privately-held key escrow system into a desktop operating system, that 
Microsoft is not talking about implementing a 'software Clipper', and 
is presently only *examining* the international ramifications of 
software key-escrow and non-escrowed strong encryption security.

Please give it this question the benefit of the doubt and postpone your 
conclusions about this until I can get an official statement, thanks.

Blanc







Thread