From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
To: merriman@metronet.com
Message Hash: 37eea025772273ae001c4a64e339bc963d6d34805ed03333b87cc7670b31893c
Message ID: <9407280306.AA18192@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-28 03:06:49 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 20:06:49 PDT
From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 94 20:06:49 PDT
To: merriman@metronet.com
Subject: RE:
Message-ID: <9407280306.AA18192@netmail2.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: David K. Merriman
It has been brought up on the Cypherpunks mailing list that Microsoft is
proposing to include public-key escrow as a *built-in* "function" of future
products - Chicago and Daytona have been specifically mentioned.
......................................................................
..........
No, this is not correct. It was speculation from Tim May on possible
developments, based on his interpretation of recent events and on email
which I sent to him. This email was referring to the fact that his
concerns notwithstanding, it is not an easy thing to implement a
privately-held key escrow system into a desktop operating system, that
Microsoft is not talking about implementing a 'software Clipper', and
is presently only *examining* the international ramifications of
software key-escrow and non-escrowed strong encryption security.
Please give it this question the benefit of the doubt and postpone your
conclusions about this until I can get an official statement, thanks.
Blanc
Return to July 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”