1994-07-28 - Re: DES Vulnerable, Why?
Header Data
From: koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 47ee7df8f6e3d3fda9fe0cc26d7f3d208c98f138f5aab6c46a14df2a69e78255
Message ID: <9407281817.AA07052@io.lrcs.loral.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-28 18:18:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 11:18:44 PDT
Raw message
From: koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 11:18:44 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: DES Vulnerable, Why?
Message-ID: <9407281817.AA07052@io.lrcs.loral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>My question: if triple-DES is so damn tough to break, what is wrong with DES?
> Triple-DES is a trivial variation on DES.
Brute Force Key Search ala' Weiner.
Thread
Return to July 1994
Return to “koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )”
1994-07-28 (Thu, 28 Jul 94 11:18:44 PDT) - Re: DES Vulnerable, Why? - koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )