1994-07-08 - RE: “Cypherpunk” vs. “Cryptorebel”

Header Data

From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 531ea84d54644dace1d9e0ce33e619fe130cb4c3e80c830546248cc891c7b0e7
Message ID: <9407081615.AA29953@internal.apple.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-08 16:17:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Jul 94 09:17:17 PDT

Raw message

From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 94 09:17:17 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: "Cypherpunk" vs. "Cryptorebel"
Message-ID: <9407081615.AA29953@internal.apple.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>On Wed, 6 Jul 1994, Lefty wrote:
>
>> >I like the label "cryptorebel" better than "cypherpunk".  The word
>> >"punk" just does not seem right, while "rebel" does.   I do have a
>> >certain attachment to "cypherpunk".  Comments?
>>
>> If it weren't for nitpickers, we'd all be knee-deep in nits.
>
>   There is too much "name recognition" in "cypherpunk" for it to be dropped 
>now...IMHO.

A more serious problem with the name "cryptorebel", which did not
immediately occur to me, is that crypto-whatever generally means "someone
who denies being a 'whatever' but, in fact, is one".

In the words of Inigo Montoya, "You keep using that word, but I don't think
it means what _you_ think it does".

--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.







Thread