From: an104090@anon.penet.fi
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6ee4ceeeb40050cd2373f2ec9e7e06f02a81510884a3ec6a6c4c496d01eacc95
Message ID: <9407061926.AA04739@anon.penet.fi>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-06 19:59:49 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Jul 94 12:59:49 PDT
From: an104090@anon.penet.fi
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 94 12:59:49 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: MAIL: chained remailing strategy
Message-ID: <9407061926.AA04739@anon.penet.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I was curious about the pros and cons of anonymous remailers holding and
randomly sending outgoing mail. It seems to me that the risk of a third
party determining the original sender of an anonymous piece of mail through
the use of timestamps is less pressing than the risk presented by the
physical storage of that mail on someone's machine for extended periods of time.
Of course, with chained remailing, these risks dramatically decrease, but
would I rather have the first remailer in a chain storing my mail until
midnight or immediately bouncing it to another anonymous remailer?
Gedeon Edwards
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.
Return to July 1994
Return to “an104090@anon.penet.fi”
1994-07-06 (Wed, 6 Jul 94 12:59:49 PDT) - Re: MAIL: chained remailing strategy - an104090@anon.penet.fi