1994-07-17 - Re: Hashed hash

Header Data

From: Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
To: N/A
Message Hash: 767dec7d1c9228cb93f1f8bec2f611f908088d658798185e225e417c1b0e4cc2
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9407171009.A17186-0100000@xmission>
Reply To: <199407170719.AA03993@world.std.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-17 16:58:53 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Jul 94 09:58:53 PDT

Raw message

From: Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 94 09:58:53 PDT
Subject: Re: Hashed hash
In-Reply-To: <199407170719.AA03993@world.std.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9407171009.A17186-0100000@xmission>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Sun, 17 Jul 1994, Kent Borg wrote:
> sift unique dummies that way.  Another problem: it is expensive to
> monitor the dummies.  (1990's biz opportunity?, the monitoring of data
> that no one is supposed to have.)
Well, you can pass the expense on to the company that is doing the 
mailing, by making the ratio of the dummies to the real ones about 10 to 1.

Roger.





Thread