1994-07-09 - Re: (fwd) Re: BSD random() - any good (source included)

Header Data

From: tim werner <werner@mc.ab.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9fdba6ce3afdf876cfe3db98cc32f2967222f6729025e905d485318bea8926a1
Message ID: <199407090225.WAA12649@sparcserver.mc.ab.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-09 02:25:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Jul 94 19:25:24 PDT

Raw message

From: tim werner <werner@mc.ab.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 94 19:25:24 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: BSD random() - any good (source included)
Message-ID: <199407090225.WAA12649@sparcserver.mc.ab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Date: Fri, 08 Jul 1994 16:00:23 -0500
>From: "Bill O'Hanlon" <wmo@digibd.com>
>
>> Bottem line is that at this point there is no clear cut 'standard' that I 
>> have seen agreed on. Hell, I haven't even seen any discussion over it beyond
>> a bunch of polemics over what people like and don't like, which are not 
>> in any way necessarily related to what people need or want.
>
>The reason for this is that people can usually get a hint; there's been no
>need for a formal standard, because when someone does something irritating
>several people shout, and the person has (with a couple of wild exceptions)
>quit the irritating behavior.

I agree with this.


>You don't seem as far around the bend as either of the wild exceptions that
>come to mind (Detweiler and that weird fellow that raved for about two weeks
                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    "Thinking and Speaking for Himself!"
>two months ago) so I'm guessing you wouldn't want to be lumped in with them.
>But by continuing to defend what obviously irritated a half dozen people,
>with plenty more like me agreeing but unwilling to join in the fray to 
>compound the problem, that's what you're courting.

This is not the first time Choate has refused to let go of an argument.  I
smelled this coming.  Wonder how long this one will last?

tw





Thread