1994-07-28 - Signature Stripping and anon servers

Header Data

From: gkremen@netcom.com (Gary Kremen)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a1082602370530689a0e7c2565b93f613b8150fef8e0db937a6d4ab00ae1e010
Message ID: <199407281608.JAA16814@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-28 16:08:03 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 09:08:03 PDT

Raw message

From: gkremen@netcom.com (Gary Kremen)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 94 09:08:03 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Signature Stripping and anon servers
Message-ID: <199407281608.JAA16814@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Article 17408 of alt.privacy:
Xref: netcom.com alt.privacy:17408
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Path: netcom.com!gkremen
From: gkremen@netcom.com
Subject: Signature stripping and anon servers?
Message-ID: <gkremenCtMrv2.190@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 03:18:38 GMT
Lines: 25


I am new to this group so please forgive my ignorance.  I am looking at
putting together a local anonymous server.  However, people here have
signatures that might give them away.  They also forget that they have
signatures.  Is there a general (and I know that you can't cover all
cases) of stripping signatures?  What I was thinking about was:


Read last 100 lines of message
  if a line begins with --
  then if no MIME v1.0 header present
       then delete last 100 lines
       else if -- is part of part-boundary
            then ignore
            else delete last 100 lines


Does anyone have any gross problems with this methodology?
If so or if you have any suggestions, send mail to me
and I will post the best stuff.


Thanks in advance.

Gary









Thread