1994-07-19 - Re: Card Playing Protocol

Header Data

From: xentrac@cybele.unm.edu (Kragen J. Sittler)
To: klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu (Karl Lui Barrus)
Message Hash: a209de7f9ef144f991206b25baa47cc734eec2c1d7aa546d4a7f9267a8d26333
Message ID: <9407190837.AA15374@cybele.unm.edu>
Reply To: <9407182303.AA03222@flammulated.owlnet.rice.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-19 08:37:30 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Jul 94 01:37:30 PDT

Raw message

From: xentrac@cybele.unm.edu (Kragen J. Sittler)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 94 01:37:30 PDT
To: klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu (Karl Lui Barrus)
Subject: Re: Card Playing Protocol
In-Reply-To: <9407182303.AA03222@flammulated.owlnet.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <9407190837.AA15374@cybele.unm.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Karl Lui Barrus:
> The house shuffles, bit commits to the shuffle, and sends you the
> hash.  Then, you can begin playing, or you can try to break the system
> by finding a deck with a matching hash.  After you are done, the
> casino sends you the deck and you can verify that you weren't cheated.
> 
> All sorts of other stuff can be added later, like digital cash, etc.

Salting the deck before hashing it could prevent the above attack.
Hopefully not too many people will suggest this on the list. :)

Kragen




Thread