From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: “P. J. Ponder” <ponder@freenet.scri.fsu.edu>
Message Hash: a863574168c38b7d80a4a7222cd25092e9116e1e23dafb9d391d5bec21f1b262
Message ID: <9407080738.AA05269@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9407080103.A27236-0100000@freenet3.scri.fsu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-08 07:39:01 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Jul 94 00:39:01 PDT
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 94 00:39:01 PDT
To: "P. J. Ponder" <ponder@freenet.scri.fsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Fortune magazine
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9407080103.A27236-0100000@freenet3.scri.fsu.edu>
Message-ID: <9407080738.AA05269@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> On another subject, does RIPEM interoperate with PGP or other public key
> software? I have version 1.0.5 for DOS. Thanks for any replies.
> ponder@freenet.scri.fsu.edu
RIPEM does not interoperate with PGP, but it may interoperate with
other programs, like TIS/PEM, which attempt to implement the RFC 1421
message-format spec.
It turns out that the signature algorithms are similar, so it may be
possible in a future version of PGP (3.0?) to get the signatures to be
equivalent, so you could, theoretically, convert a signed PGP document
into a signed RIPEM document (and vice-versa).
Since RIPEM uses DES (or triple-DES), and PGP uses IDEA, encrypted
documents are not cryptographically equivalent.
Hope this helps..
-derek
Return to July 1994
Return to ““P. J. Ponder” <ponder@freenet.scri.fsu.edu>”