1994-07-07 - Re: “Cypherpunk” vs. “Cryptorebel”

Header Data

From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
To: hayden@vorlon.mankato.msus.edu (Robert A. Hayden)
Message Hash: c3c92e63813b5e0abd54b416f5344582176bb9f56bae775dd23cebb06223e60b
Message ID: <9407070234.AA15708@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9407062016.B5897-0100000@vorlon.mankato.msus.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-07 01:31:47 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Jul 94 18:31:47 PDT

Raw message

From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 94 18:31:47 PDT
To: hayden@vorlon.mankato.msus.edu (Robert A. Hayden)
Subject: Re: "Cypherpunk" vs. "Cryptorebel"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9407062016.B5897-0100000@vorlon.mankato.msus.edu>
Message-ID: <9407070234.AA15708@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



> 
> Cypher was an interesting play on words to describe this fight.
> 
> Somehow, it seems far more appropriate than 'cryptorebel', which sounds a 
> whole lot like new-age PC crap designed to make us sound more appetizing 
> to the popular media.
>

I've been a "cypherpunks" list subscriber since (almost) the creation
of the list. We've (collectively) had this discussion more times
than I can count.

Please, let's drop this thread and move on to more productive 
pastures.   ,-)

Cheers.

- paul
 




Thread