1994-07-11 - Re: using RSA-the-cryptosystem to secure RSA-the-company’s patent?

Header Data

From: Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov>
To: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Message Hash: cc16af41848e928b09b30075e4ce391ddd007ce7c7954c8e6be411be7cf67f7d
Message ID: <199407110444.VAA00229@hot.ee.lbl.gov>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-11 04:44:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Jul 94 21:44:20 PDT

Raw message

From: Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 94 21:44:20 PDT
To: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: using RSA-the-cryptosystem to secure RSA-the-company's patent?
Message-ID: <199407110444.VAA00229@hot.ee.lbl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>The point of this is, why would *you* care?  I can understand why RSA
>_might_ care, but I don't see Phil Zimmermann agreeing to it, and I
>don't see how anyone could force it into PGP at this point.

They got the stupid version number thing in; if they had thought of
a better trap, they could probably have gotten that in instead.

The point is, the secret key would not be in the source code.  I can't
think of a way to use that; you can't; RSA couldn't; but I'm not
convinced it's impossible.
---
Jef





Thread