From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Message Hash: d1ada205a8687c2a5eeb28f71d5df1cfcad2812f46b44b26dcc5e1535b34d74e
Message ID: <9407081316.AA05465@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199407071547.QAA09077@an-teallach.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-08 13:16:28 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Jul 94 06:16:28 PDT
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 94 06:16:28 PDT
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Counting Bits
In-Reply-To: <199407071547.QAA09077@an-teallach.com>
Message-ID: <9407081316.AA05465@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Graham Toal says:
> PS I dunno what superoptimisizer Perry is talking about but I've
> never heard of a real one that works. You have to feed in a complete
> machine description at register transfer level and i don't know if
> those exist for real machines; also the problem is almost certainly
> exponential time for a *guaranteed* solution as Perry claims is
> possible.
As I've noted, Henry Massalin invented the superoptimizer -- and it
works -- a much slower but publically available implementation that
Henry had nothing to do with is available from the FSF as "Gnu
Superopt".
Perry
Return to July 1994
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>”