1994-07-01 - Re: Detweiler clone at WS

Header Data

From: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
Message Hash: d66cf1e945c257c89082417fb82b15cd197ba323959cc8e6d0b23253b0533760
Message ID: <940701.070436.2K1.rusnews.w165w@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org>
Reply To: <199407010937.AA24172@panix.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-01 13:02:23 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 06:02:23 PDT

Raw message

From: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 94 06:02:23 PDT
To: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
Subject: Re: Detweiler clone at WS
In-Reply-To: <199407010937.AA24172@panix.com>
Message-ID: <940701.070436.2K1.rusnews.w165w@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In list.cypherpunks, frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell) writes:

> R.>The down side was that licensing was mentioned as the first recourse
> R.>from the state.  When we complained of the financial hit, the talk
> R.>turned to registration.  But the sense was clearly toward proactive
> R.>state control.
> 
> Are these people mentally retarded or what.

I'm not qualified to answer that.  :)

> A BBS is a publication.  The
> 1st Amendment was specifically written to outlaw the British licensing of 
> publications.  No risk.

Until some case law comes about that recognizes this, It Just Ain't So.
Right now, electronic publishing isn't recognized by the courts as
publishing (because we don't kill trees, I suppose).
- -- 
Roy M. Silvernail  []  roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org

                          It's just this little chromium switch.......

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAwUBLhQHBBvikii9febJAQF88wQAkHE6Kj9ALRSXZBy5jP2+8X4afaoC4PD+
12jUKDlLfPw1PE7NicHwwO/gBk9Zhq0s2+rTpvaG5Ih61VxC/xQ+IAsrK1B9Dpfr
WReuAi4NsDih5wO4EFKMR7aYlreTPqGXOtu1M4hq46C26OVgi5MPnjp6T8jOHGch
X2tTml0XqEI=
=9pxs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread