From: Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e833b629e29dd54671ee985075c042a110dc5146654299a2d8950b6ee34053e0
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9407231003.A1643-0100000@xmission>
Reply To: <199407231531.IAA16454@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-23 16:19:45 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 23 Jul 94 09:19:45 PDT
From: Berzerk <berzerk@xmission.xmission.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 94 09:19:45 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Card Playing Protocol? (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199407231531.IAA16454@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9407231003.A1643-0100000@xmission>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 23 Jul 1994, Hal wrote:
> I thought of a simpler way to attack the blackjack protocol proposed
> by Karl, where the dealer shuffles the cards, commits to a hash, and
> then the player checks the hash at the end of the deck. Simply, this
How about if the dealer sends out the hash of the original deck, then
each player sends back a permutation(first a hash, for disclosure and
commitment, then the open value). The permutations are then applied
to the deck as shuffled by the dealer, distroying his order. The
"goodness" of the original shuffle would allow security from colusion
among all the players, and the presence of any one good permutation will
shuffle the deck.
Berzerk.
**********************************************************************
Berserker n.,
1)a devotee of Odin in early Norse society who fought with a frenzied rage
in battle.
Return to July 1994
Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”