From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f884bb3b67bf97749051b3b8c1ad48cc1954aa314503e7b4d2741c9cb90237e2
Message ID: <199407230214.TAA07844@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-23 02:14:08 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 19:14:08 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 94 19:14:08 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Gore's "new and improved" key escrow proposal
Message-ID: <199407230214.TAA07844@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Michael wrote:
>
>I have tried to think of a positive use for key escrow. The only thing that I
>have come up with so far is kind of like having local key escrow within one
>company, or something like that. Kind of like having a master key that fits
>all the offices in one wing of a building, or something like that. That could
>be good in some business uses, provided you could pick your own trusted master
>key holder. I don't think that is what Al Gore has in mind.
I think there is a use for key escow in our society. As someone else has
suggested on this list, all internal communication of the government should
use escowed keys. I propse us Cypherpunks as one of the escow agents.
Defininity not what Gore had in mind.
-- Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> PGP public key by finger
Return to July 1994
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”
1994-07-23 (Fri, 22 Jul 94 19:14:08 PDT) - Re: Gore’s “new and improved” key escrow proposal - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)