1994-07-12 - Re: Gov’t eyes public-key infrastructure

Header Data

From: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
To: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Message Hash: fafac119747202f152c81ad34352b41b81ccb95970d26087d6f591f468e82b4c
Message ID: <199407122029.AA13106@access2.digex.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-07-12 20:29:29 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Jul 94 13:29:29 PDT

Raw message

From: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 94 13:29:29 PDT
To: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Gov't eyes public-key infrastructure
Message-ID: <199407122029.AA13106@access2.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>>The U.S. government intends to operate a public-key certification
>>system for government users that will also serve the private sector,
>>as well. But a report just completed by Mitre Corp. for the National
>>Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) puts the price tag at
>>$1 billion for the start-up of the government alone, with a possible
>>$2 billion annual operational cost for managing certificate-revocation
>>lists.
>
>All in all, I'd say this is a pretty good argument for PGP's web of trust
>model...

Especially given that urban folklore about everyone being only 5 hops away
on the network of life. I.e. Everyone is a friend of a friend of a friend of
a friend of a friend of anyone else. This was sort of troped upon in "6 degrees
of Separation", the John Guare movie/play. 

If anyone had any concrete data about this, then it might be interesting to 
calculate the optimum number of people you should get to cosign your public
key. 
Anyone remember enough about Ramsey numbers and Graph Theory? 

-Peter

>
>Phil







Thread