From: blancw@pylon.com
To: karn@qualcomm.com
Message Hash: 027a55f2eea2afd994ea585d1fa523c8e6a60397becdbc0dcae5e22f005e1f36
Message ID: <199408280645.XAA22595@deepthought.pylon.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-28 06:50:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Aug 94 23:50:29 PDT
From: blancw@pylon.com
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 94 23:50:29 PDT
To: karn@qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: FCC Regulation (Challenging Majority Whim)
Message-ID: <199408280645.XAA22595@deepthought.pylon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
[more excruciatingly enlightening grandiloquence]
Responding to msg by Phil Karn:
. . . . how can one create a government that rises above the
petty illiberalism of the people it governs to protect the
rights of the individual?
...................................................
It appears that being given a position in charge of upholding
abstract ideals makes some people forget whose interest or
which ideal it is that they are supporting, and they take too
seriously the opportunity to lord over others. When someone
has been given responsibility over others, they seem to
suddenly lose their perspective and propose all sorts of things
contrary to what they claimed to think prior to assuming that
office.
I think there will come a time when business enterprises will
completely replace 'government' functions. Most people see
both society and political systems as means to practical ends.
These two organizations have pragmatic functions which
individuals see as advantageous to their own comfort and
advancement. When neither of these deliver on the promise of
the desired benefits, all of those who were depending upon them
complain that their expectations were betrayed. It remains to
'overthrow' these organizations or raise hell at least, but
still conditions remain largely unsatisfactory.
A business enterprise is more precisely a tool for the
realization of the kind of benefits which people are looking
for from each other. It also has the advantage of flexibility
- it can be modified to suit or disbanded altogether without
affecting uninvolved parties in the same way as must happen
when attempting to "improve" a society or a government.
A company does not recognize an individual in the same way that
a society or a government does in terms of a comprehensive
ideal, but it can better provide the means to achieve personal
goals & ambitions, and I think is thus better suited as a tool
for providing (read 'creating') what individuals could want
from the world while living in co-existence with strangers.
Blanc
Return to August 1994
Return to “blancw@pylon.com”
1994-08-28 (Sat, 27 Aug 94 23:50:29 PDT) - Re: FCC Regulation (Challenging Majority Whim) - blancw@pylon.com