From: die@pig.jjm.com (Dave Emery)
To: perry@imsi.com
Message Hash: 02e4d743187ba49383deea0744317d11d5c69ada160b7e5757311b738e6f83aa
Message ID: <9408072140.AA04971@pig.jjm.com>
Reply To: <9408071220.AA19695@snark.imsi.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-07 21:36:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 7 Aug 94 14:36:58 PDT
From: die@pig.jjm.com (Dave Emery)
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 94 14:36:58 PDT
To: perry@imsi.com
Subject: Re: e$: Cypherpunks Sell Concepts
In-Reply-To: <9408071220.AA19695@snark.imsi.com>
Message-ID: <9408072140.AA04971@pig.jjm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> It is perfectly feasable to track all financial transactions in the
> U.S., down to the "quarter for a phone call" level, without
> eliminating all capacity to use the data or placing more than, say,
> another several percent burden on the cost of all transactions.
>
> Perry
>
Already, at least here in the northeast, virtually all credit
card transactions are on-line verified - it would take relatively little
additional effort to capture additional transaction details including ID
from our spiffy new national ID card and a more specific description of
what was bought. And many supermarkets around here now do a substantial
part of their business via debit or credit cards and checks - the added
burden of converting everything over to watchable on-line electronic
transactions is probably not measured in percent per transaction but in
fractions of a percent. The major investment in on line retail
infrastructure has already been made in most cases, what needs to be added
is just some additional software and a more legally binding ID card.
One suspects that the cost of physically handling cash,
providing security for it and so forth is actually quite comparable to
costs of such a cashless electronic regime. Outlawing cash is indeed
(unfortunately) quite practical.
If I had to guess as to what *the major* domestic target of wideband
electronic surveillance and monitoring by the TLAs is licit or illict, I
would name the credit card authorization data streams. Probably that
and interbank wire and check clearing transfers consitute much the
largest cross section of data being watched regularly. And I am unclear
as to whether such surveillance, with the tacit consent of the banks and
credit card companies of course, is obviously and specifically illegal.
Dave Emery
Return to August 1994
Return to “rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)”