From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0439097ff6024925188b85f928f2f7c0bbf115d1d6e9dedbf48e66170c578f4b
Message ID: <9408290306.AA28148@ah.com>
Reply To: <199408211918.PAA21612@zork.tiac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-29 06:33:39 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Aug 94 23:33:39 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 94 23:33:39 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: In Search of Genuine DigiCash
In-Reply-To: <199408211918.PAA21612@zork.tiac.net>
Message-ID: <9408290306.AA28148@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
It's the behavior of the financial instrument I'm talking about. At some
point, the principal goes away and has to be called from wherever it is (a
bank account, the money market, etc.) to meet a cashed-out piece of
digicash. In the meantime it earns interest. Thus it has principal, and
interest, and it is called. It's a callable bond.
Now, consider a promissory note which is redeemable on demand and
which pays interest at redemption. This instrument has the same
financial properties as a callable bond.
Pop Quiz: why is this promissory note _not_ actually a callable bond?
Eric
Return to August 1994
Return to “rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)”