From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 09ff1df331ebcc415f5d1fd7e63faee86de162952ff0a92b8544ea5e1ee96504
Message ID: <199408250814.BAA29343@netcom6.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-25 08:14:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 01:14:17 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 01:14:17 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear Weapons Material
Message-ID: <199408250814.BAA29343@netcom6.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This thread is just too interesting...
Mikolaj wrote:
>
> This also depends on the type of bomb. In a two-stage fusion
>bomb, you are quite correct - the tritium-deuterium/tritium fusion
>reaction gives the boom. However, in a three-stage bomb, there is an
>additional fission reaction, this due to the fact that the neutrons
>produced by the fusion reaction have the precise energy required to
>fission U-238. Since U-238 is vastly easier to obtain than enriched
>U-235, there is no great problem with sticking in half a tonne of it.
>Around that you can add cobalt jackets, etc, for more interesting
>effects.
>
What does the cobalt jacket do?
-- Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> PGP public key by finger
Return to August 1994
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”