From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 106486374e31f2a4c0037a56400d35d6c757ed0a743b794b0c4cfc1b51fb6035
Message ID: <199408242201.PAA05838@netcom7.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-24 22:01:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Aug 94 15:01:11 PDT
From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 94 15:01:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous questionnaires
Message-ID: <199408242201.PAA05838@netcom7.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
You wrote to my question about anonymous questionnarires:
> Correlation is easy; assign people consecutive numbers or
>somesuch. If both participants are anonymous, no problem. Could you
>bring by the questionnaire by hand, in exchange for cash?
No, they are too far away.
>If not, how
>about a money order and a PO box?
>
They would still need my name.
> The audit part of this is the tough part. Would the HHS care
>to agree to a broadcast means of verification? Would participants 44,
>71 and 94 please come into the re-testing center to verify their
>participation? There could be a zero knowledge proof of some type to
>demonstrate that you are really patient 94.
>
Can someone suggest a way to accomplish all this?
TIA,
-- Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> PGP public key by finger
Return to August 1994
Return to “shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)”