1994-08-03 - RE: ‘Anon’ Fake

Header Data

From: nobody@shell.portal.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 13933ae317e3c1c8b57f50db90211eeb299b7eaba2220a5c5a5b711b89ada284
Message ID: <199408030346.UAA09985@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-03 03:46:58 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Aug 94 20:46:58 PDT

Raw message

From: nobody@shell.portal.com
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 94 20:46:58 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: 'Anon' Fake
Message-ID: <199408030346.UAA09985@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> The mechanism employed was obvious and simple -- someone subscribed an
> anXXX address to the list. Anyone looking at the subscription list can
> tell that, on their own. This technique has been used before.

Is there any evidence to link this anxxxx person to the "tuna 
fish" spam?  Given the fact that by doing a "who cypherpunks" 
will yield anyone, including various TLAs a list of potential 
"troublemakers" (by their standards), might this subscriber 
merely be trying to protect his real identity from prying eyes?  
Actually, I had thought of doing so myself, but didn't want to 
over-burden Julf's server with such a high volume of mail, plus 
having the mesages get cut off whenever a dashed line was 
encountered.

FWIW, other list servers have a "set conceal" option which, upon 
request, keeps a person's address from becoming public through 
the "who" command.

- -- Diogenes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAgUBLj70d+Rsd2rRFQ1JAQFSlwP+NkXJSaKlUKuFnLhzHWjGxd6X+prUlPiV
NsKGBXON6ATKGTvcCE8IG+A17MwkxNi4PxnOvmdCyyI+940Rz9uDmZo8qSW5EWip
7oQ/mEFGnxRY7wkw+99QHpASxBE/9nJSvuCM0AwGfZ5/0rMSUE1t2M52PAfZcELa
9G+cEM9GiPM=
=tzW7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread