From: pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
To: jamesd@netcom.com
Message Hash: 2bfcef25cd5e9ff326fb680aab284663b83361a990f8ae361d6a6153e197239a
Message ID: <9408301749.AA04640@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
Reply To: <199408301723.KAA00736@netcom8.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-30 17:53:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 10:53:13 PDT
From: pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 10:53:13 PDT
To: jamesd@netcom.com
Subject: Nuclear Weapons Material
In-Reply-To: <199408301723.KAA00736@netcom8.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9408301749.AA04640@focis.sda.cbis.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> This must be deliberate misinformation. It is relatively easy to
> make two explosive lenses that are exactly alike. It is extremely
> difficult to make two explosive lenses that differ by a precisely
> known and constant amount.
No one said it was easy.
> The security in a nuclear weapon could certainly be defeated by
> physically ripping out any encryption electronics and replacing
> them with electronics with known and simple behavior.
That was the entire point. Having explosive lenses that aren't all
the same defeats attacks on the electronics.
Return to August 1994
Return to “pstemari@bismark.cbis.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)”