From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2c3b1bf5b14d86d7812b43c86863316787c2deb1a663ddba39f98744e5df7d69
Message ID: <199408241451.KAA25401@pipe1.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-24 14:51:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Aug 94 07:51:40 PDT
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 94 07:51:40 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear Weapons Material, Truly?
Message-ID: <199408241451.KAA25401@pipe1.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Responding to msg by perry@imsi.com ("Perry E. Metzger") on
Wed, 24 Aug 9:10 AM
>(I'm not sure
>that people outside of the bomb building industry
>really know *for sure* what the geometries used in the
>atomic weapon that sets off the fusion reaction.)
Perhaps. However, there is much detailed design and production
info in the "Nuclear Weapons Databook" series:
U. S. Nuclear Warhead Production, Volume II, 1987.
U. S. Nuclear Warhead Facility Profiles, Volume III, 1987.
Soviet Nuclear Weapons, Volume IV, 1989.
And others.
The series provides pretty detailed textual and graphic
descriptions of the entire history of design, production,
testing and deployment of nuclear weapons.
These are written by the folks at Natural Resources Defense
Council and are available there and from Ballinger Division,
Harper and Row, New York.
The beloved McGeorge Bundy is quoted on the covers:
"A powerful antidote to the simplistic deceptions peddled with
such zeal from high places . . . contains more facts about the
past, present and future of [U. S. nuclear] forces than have
ever been put in one place before . . . meticulous and
responsible . . . the effect is overwhelming."
They are mesmerizing. But then maybe they were written only
for the ignorant.
John
Return to August 1994
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1994-08-24 (Wed, 24 Aug 94 07:51:40 PDT) - Re: Nuclear Weapons Material, Truly? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>