From: jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk (Jim Dixon)
To: karn@unix.ka9q.ampr.org
Message Hash: 3828ba8b628e7fbc6285fac1ba86cf9e97aa079ff7f31eb7ba9ca8c485d874e0
Message ID: <8051@aiki.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-26 13:30:48 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Aug 94 06:30:48 PDT
From: jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk (Jim Dixon)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 94 06:30:48 PDT
To: karn@unix.ka9q.ampr.org
Subject: Re: DSPs
Message-ID: <8051@aiki.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In message <199408260422.VAA16628@unix.ka9q.ampr.org> Phil Karn writes:
> I'm not really an expert on DSPs, but it does seem like they should be
> good for modular exponentiation given the number of multiplies required.
> But I don't think I'm the first to point that out.
DSPs are actually optimized for the operation required in the FFT: integer
inner products. A DSP will have hardware for extremely fast summations of
expressions like
c[i]*x[i]
where the c[i] are constants, and new x vectors are introduced at a high
rate.
This is somewhat different than the kind of fast multiplication you are
looking for.
--
Jim Dixon
Return to August 1994
Return to “jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk (Jim Dixon)”
1994-08-26 (Fri, 26 Aug 94 06:30:48 PDT) - Re: DSPs - jdd@aiki.demon.co.uk (Jim Dixon)