1994-08-28 - Re: In Search of Genuine DigiCash

Header Data

From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 395e7ccb2ca52269505a82bfba1e8cf5f0f3d74804d6afdd07adffb33cb130a2
Message ID: <199408280516.BAA15352@zork.tiac.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-28 05:17:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Aug 94 22:17:37 PDT

Raw message

From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 94 22:17:37 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: In Search of Genuine DigiCash
Message-ID: <199408280516.BAA15352@zork.tiac.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:09 AM 8/27/94 -0700, Eric Hughes wrote:


>One can consider that a digital cash exchange creates a delay between
>the two legs of the transaction.  In between the beginning and end,
>the transaction is suspended.  That's the sense of the word.

If you mean the transaction that occurs between the net as a whole and
underwriter. I agree. There may be lots of non-trivial transactions on the
net in the meantime, however. Nevertheless I'll keep using "suspension
account" until I'm disabused of it, for lack of a more descriptive word,
than for anything else.

>
>"Float" is a financial concept, not an accounting one or a legal one.
>The issues are greater than financial ones only, and the terminology
>needed is correspondingly greater.

As an aside, most finance professors consider accounting to be applied
finance. I expect that accountants don't take to that kindly, however.

"Float" reminds me of "kiting checks", for some reason, so I'm glad not to
use it now.

Cheers,
Bob Hettinga

-----------------
Robert Hettinga  (rah@shipwright.com) "There is no difference between someone
Shipwright Development Corporation     who eats too little and sees Heaven and
44 Farquhar Street                       someone who drinks too much and sees
Boston, MA 02331 USA                       snakes." -- Bertrand Russell
(617) 323-7923







Thread