1994-08-26 - Re: Nuclear Weapons Material

Header Data

From: jkbacon@pacifier.com (Kirk Bacon)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 39c33f98bb250e6fd567df60ae883b9ab58e837de4239299d4a9ed6fb04ff7ac
Message ID: <m0qdv35-0005rmC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-26 06:54:57 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 23:54:57 PDT

Raw message

From: jkbacon@pacifier.com (Kirk Bacon)
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 23:54:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear Weapons Material
Message-ID: <m0qdv35-0005rmC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>	I was under the impression that the most common techniquoe for
>creating armour-piercing munitions was to use shaped-charges. While
>depleted uranium has it's uses (being, as someone said, rather dense),
>mass alone will not get through everything. A shaped charge will get
>through more things more violently :)
>

Depleted uranium is used in armor piercing rounds for three reasons:
1.  High density
2.  High hardness - not quite that of tungsten, but its up there.
3.  Upon impact it ignites (like magnesium) and burns.  The burning uranium
melts steel and also produces uranium oxide in the process.  If this isn't
"violent" enough, try fission.

Kirk






Thread