From: weidai@eskimo.com (Wei Dai)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 43960bdf81ccc0114586aa36721869d953ed50b46eb43308b31434d1dacdbbf9
Message ID: <199408210027.AA00747@eskimo.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-21 00:28:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Aug 94 17:28:11 PDT
From: weidai@eskimo.com (Wei Dai)
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 94 17:28:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: coming soon: secure digit
Message-ID: <199408210027.AA00747@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
tcmay@netcom.com wrote:
> Their work involves having the user compute a hash of the document
> he wishes to be stamped and sending the hash to them, where they
> merge this hash with other hashes (and all previous hashes, via a
> tree system) and then they *publish* the resultant hash in a very
> public and hard-to-alter forum, such as in an ad in the Sunday New
> York Times.
Can you give a more detailed description of the system? The specific
question I have is how exactly does a third party know that a time stamp
is not forged? What algorithm or protocol does he use?
If there is more than one time stamping service and if they use
different systems, how do the courts know which ones to accept?
Wei Dai
cc: TCMAY@NETCOM.COM in 0009 on ESKIMO
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLlad5Tl0sXKgdnV5AQFjXQQAuIU+eb/yLxrhXWwDwOfuK/rKi7Tq+Pz8
3FFe+BD6ZB+nLrXPnb5geNQuVFQX3K4cW1JEm4dVPvo5DDXFZaM/sH5g2XySrjaz
9FeeTa4wYtEydhJXAlzpENuWxyXTn+NIQov+e5kKQybKgOW5AglwnMexd+ls7o1U
juUxkbqdSZY=
=FyNB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
PGP Public Key available
Return to August 1994
Return to “weidai@eskimo.com (Wei Dai)”
1994-08-21 (Sat, 20 Aug 94 17:28:11 PDT) - coming soon: secure digit - weidai@eskimo.com (Wei Dai)