From: cactus@bb.com (L. Todd Masco)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 461ab8f244f47a1ec8985d40f3c2e47fa055408e65b665c0825830ab14e728ab
Message ID: <338j90$bcb@bb.com>
Reply To: <gate.ku4FRc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-21 22:03:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Aug 94 15:03:33 PDT
From: cactus@bb.com (L. Todd Masco)
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 94 15:03:33 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Governing an information society - 4/4
In-Reply-To: <gate.ku4FRc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <338j90$bcb@bb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <gate.ku4FRc1w165w@dxm.ernet.in>, <rishab@dxm.ernet.in> wrote:
>Data crime - 'cracking', 'phreaking' etc usually reflect a total lack of
>responsibility on the part of _administrators_. "Officer, I left my wallet
>on the kerb 10 minutes ago, and now it's gone!"
Sorry for the tone (sort of), but...
This sounds like typical kiddie-cracker garbage. It's more like, "Officer,
I didn't know that master locks could be picked with the greatest of ease:
arrest that man who picked it and took my wallet."
(It is, in fact, trivial to pick Master locks -- far more trivial than to
run crack on a passwd file -- yet many people still keep valuables behind
them.)
Security is a subject that takes time to learn, especially in this day
of UNIX boxes on the Internet: it is not reasonable to expect that people
should acquire an intimate understanding of how to implement secure
methods to have an expectation of privacy.
You can ignore that we live in a technically semi-literate (at best)
society, but then you have no business talking about the world we live
in.
--
L. Todd Masco | "Large prime numbers imply arrest." - Previously meaningless
cactus@bb.com | grammatically correct sentence. Now...
Return to August 1994
Return to “rishab@dxm.ernet.in”