1994-08-11 - Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@imsi.com>
To: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Message Hash: 651475378d803ba86c163d0cd2091b58d1dbf1c46964fd1291d55b49a84d9004
Message ID: <9408111629.AA29020@snark.imsi.com>
Reply To: <199408111448.HAA17336@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-11 16:29:46 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Aug 94 09:29:46 PDT

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 94 09:29:46 PDT
To: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Subject: Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
In-Reply-To: <199408111448.HAA17336@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <9408111629.AA29020@snark.imsi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Hal says:
> This is one of the things that worries me about the Digital
> Telephony bill.  In the various apologias and explanations from EFF,
> CyberWire Dispatch, etc.  about why EFF helped with this bill, it
> was mentioned that online service providers have been removed from
> its coverage because they are not "common carriers".  It only
> applies, they say, to common carriers like phone companies.

UUNET, among others, considers itself to be a common carrier.

Perry





Thread