From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6f12ff1bcbca4179d238311abf6ae0d27a56db16cbf9eec220758f49e0b3709f
Message ID: <9408062320.AA17234@ah.com>
Reply To: <199408061531.IAA28014@jobe.shell.portal.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-06 23:48:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Aug 94 16:48:42 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 94 16:48:42 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Improved remailer reordering
In-Reply-To: <199408061531.IAA28014@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Message-ID: <9408062320.AA17234@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
About message mixing:
A measure that is used for situations like this is entropy.
Indeed. This is exactly the mathematical measure for what I've called
"privacy diffusion" in a remailer network. It is, namely a measure of
of the uncertainty to a watcher of what ingoing message corresponds to
what outgoing message.
As soon as you begin to write down some of the equations for this
value, several things become distinct possibilities:
-- duplicate messages may decrease security
-- retries may reduce security
-- interactive protocols may reduce security
-- there is such a thing as a needlessly lengthy remailer path
-- noise messages might not be worth the bother
-- multiple different routes may reduce security
One thing becomes blaringly obvious:
-- it's reordering that's mathematically significant; that's what goes
directly into the equations.
To consider different batching strategies, consider a remailer where the
messages come in one per hour, at 1:00, 2:00, 3:00, etc.
Since the particulars of the time don't matter for this analysis, I'd
suggest using the terminology "message interval", since the entropy
calculation is time-scale invariant.
Hal's suggestion for rollover schemes is a good one. I'll be working
on the math for it.
Eric
Return to August 1994
Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”