From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7bf6f561f447d91eb146b10cdb2b2c7da45d7484e6d453918a1985c571606ac2
Message ID: <9408290518.AA28267@ah.com>
Reply To: <199408280514.BAA15329@zork.tiac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-29 06:32:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Aug 94 23:32:29 PDT
From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 94 23:32:29 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: e$: A prima facie business model for a digital cash underwriter.
In-Reply-To: <199408280514.BAA15329@zork.tiac.net>
Message-ID: <9408290518.AA28267@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
My favorite one, and the one which may be most
apprehendable to the public, is an ATM-card gate in which the purchaser
swipes his card into a secure mosaic screen using a card reader at home
(they're pretty cheap these days, and could get cheaper if this became
prevalent).
As a rule of thumb, the purchase of any hardware of any kind, no
matter how inexpensive, drops your potential market by a factor of
ten.
That means anything put up on your spiffy Sparc machine and it's attendant
code should be able to:
1. Generate to purchasers and take in digital cash from sellers.
2. Identify double spenders.
Why item two? Have you made a decision that charging for deposit
attempts doesn't work, or that identity is still needed for some
reason?
Eric
Return to August 1994
Return to “rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)”