1994-08-01 - Re: Philadelphia Enquirer Story on Clipper

Header Data

From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 81ce461d713378b4d0fcb3e5e14a8f2692dc0c6467befd340b7fac91ec9c803c
Message ID: <199408011516.AA29716@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-01 15:18:11 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Aug 94 08:18:11 PDT

Raw message

From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 94 08:18:11 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Philadelphia Enquirer Story on Clipper
Message-ID: <199408011516.AA29716@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 06:55 AM 8/1/94 -0400, Duncan Frissell wrote:

>Course the 1st Amend. was specifically designed to eliminate the nasty
>British habit of licensing newspapers.  Driving licenses weren't mentioned
>in that document.  Have their been any licensing proposals for the
>Information Stupor Highway yet?  If the Supremes will let me burn a cross,
>isn't it likely that they will let me log on?

To further answer myself...

Note that we have had telephones for more than 100 years without any
licensing of telephones in this country.  In fact, the telephone companies
were prohibited from denying service save on a number of narrow grounds.
And that was in a much tighter regulatory environment than seems destined to
exist in the future.

DCF

"License Communists -- not Workstations"






Thread