1994-08-09 - e$

Header Data

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8b3d3923ff7c8bc1b01cc59cb6601b93429132358c74387772cfbcba9054ce59
Message ID: <9408091725.AA22702@ah.com>
Reply To: <4652@aiki.demon.co.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1994-08-09 17:53:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Aug 94 10:53:57 PDT

Raw message

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 94 10:53:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: e$
In-Reply-To: <4652@aiki.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <9408091725.AA22702@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


   If A writes a check to 'cash', pays B with it, and B passes it on to
   C, and so forth, are you saying that this is or will one day be illegal?

An individual note and its transfers are unlikely to be made illegal.
But that's not the whole story.  A company engaged in the business of
issuing such notes and not recording (perhaps, a fortiori, by not
being able to record) the transactions among people for these
instruments, however, could be ruled to be performing a separate
activity which could then be made illegal.

Just because a single act is legal doesn't mean that a bunch of the
same acts are.  For example, not reporting a $5000 cash transfer is
legal, but not reporting half a dozen of them made to the same person
in the same day almost certainly is.

Eric





Thread